Website health for people who have a business to run

See what your WordPress site is quietly telling visitors.

A focused audit of public security, SEO, content, crawlability, and performance signals. Written in plain language. Built to avoid aggressive scanning.

northline.examplePublic page
78Healthy foundation
Transport
SEO
Content
Mobile
Priority 01

Add a site-specific Content Security Policy after validating required scripts and services.

Explainable checks Bounded requests SSRF-protected backend PDF and JSON reports
A useful first pass

Three disciplines, one business-readable report.

The dashboard avoids pretending that one score can prove a site is secure. It shows the evidence, the limits, and the next action.

01

Transport and headers

HTTPS, TLS status, mixed content, security headers, and a visible WordPress version when the page exposes it.

02

Search and content

Titles, descriptions, headings, image alternatives, robots.txt, XML sitemaps, and a bounded broken-link sample.

03

Delivery basics

HTML response timing, document weight, resource clues, image size signals, and mobile viewport checks.

One page. Bounded requests. Useful answers.

Start with the URL a customer would visit.

SiteGuard reads public signals only. It does not log in, submit forms, test passwords, run exploits, or crawl an entire site.

Public pages only

SiteGuard Lite is a limited automated first-pass assessment. Results may be incomplete or inaccurate and should not be treated as a security certification, compliance review, or substitute for a professional audit.

Non-invasive No credentials or exploit probes
Explainable Every finding includes evidence and a next step
04
Responsible by default

The most important feature is what the tool refuses to do.

SiteGuard Lite does not test passwords, submit login forms, enumerate accounts, fire exploit payloads, scan private networks, or claim to certify security.

It makes a small number of public requests, records observable evidence, and explains where a browser test or professional review is still needed.